<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Training- What We Want vs. What We Need</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/</link>
	<description>Sensemaking for the precision machining industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 22:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you Glen on the machining in Universities, I have a Biomedical Engineering Degree, and work as a design/Mfg. and Quality Engineer. I went to school and graduated with guys that couldn&#039;t operate a hand drill and I needed to teach them how... in COLLEGE... I showed some how to weld, how to turn, mill... These were engineering seniors across numerous specialties that were clueless.

When we were working on projects at the university the shop was still out of date (decent shop, 2 manual lathes from the 60&#039;s and 2 bridgeport mills) so too low tech for a number of projects that needed multi-axis NC operations to make properly. However, the shop instructor didn&#039;t want me using the machines and locked me out of the shop on a number of occasions since he didn&#039;t train me... I ran lathes and mills starting when I was 14 years old in high school and started fixing them for the teacher when I was 16, ran CNC&#039;s after high school and I couldn&#039;t run the same 1950 bridgeport the high school had when I was at the university because the instructor didn&#039;t trust me...

It&#039;s not always a question of the skills, but I&#039;ve seen too many people who feel that the uninitiated are incapable because of their skill set. For example, programming a microprocessor does not gain anyone bonus points on programming a CNC. However, most students programming assembly language simulate dangerous scenarios before risking destroying or crashing a system. The language and skill set may be unusual, but that has nothing to do with the math, thought process, and outcome of a successful program and repeatable part. and lastly G-Code is essentially an assembly language that gets read the same way.. if you can write a program, you can write a program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Glen on the machining in Universities, I have a Biomedical Engineering Degree, and work as a design/Mfg. and Quality Engineer. I went to school and graduated with guys that couldn&#8217;t operate a hand drill and I needed to teach them how&#8230; in COLLEGE&#8230; I showed some how to weld, how to turn, mill&#8230; These were engineering seniors across numerous specialties that were clueless.</p>
<p>When we were working on projects at the university the shop was still out of date (decent shop, 2 manual lathes from the 60&#8242;s and 2 bridgeport mills) so too low tech for a number of projects that needed multi-axis NC operations to make properly. However, the shop instructor didn&#8217;t want me using the machines and locked me out of the shop on a number of occasions since he didn&#8217;t train me&#8230; I ran lathes and mills starting when I was 14 years old in high school and started fixing them for the teacher when I was 16, ran CNC&#8217;s after high school and I couldn&#8217;t run the same 1950 bridgeport the high school had when I was at the university because the instructor didn&#8217;t trust me&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not always a question of the skills, but I&#8217;ve seen too many people who feel that the uninitiated are incapable because of their skill set. For example, programming a microprocessor does not gain anyone bonus points on programming a CNC. However, most students programming assembly language simulate dangerous scenarios before risking destroying or crashing a system. The language and skill set may be unusual, but that has nothing to do with the math, thought process, and outcome of a successful program and repeatable part. and lastly G-Code is essentially an assembly language that gets read the same way.. if you can write a program, you can write a program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Haskell</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn, you have hit on another area.  Those ME students probably don&#039;t learn those skills at a University ME program.  I hear that from ME Lab Techs all the time that students don&#039;t have those skills.  Why you ask?  Because they did not go through a secondary or post-secondary Technical Program.  They went straight from a regular high school to University.  High Schools don&#039;t neccessarily teach those kind of things.  Industrial Arts programs have been systematically stripped out of middle &amp; high schools, due to funding and perception issues.  A major shame!  You need to let high school principals and superintendents this.  Universities usually don&#039;t teach skills like that.  

I am being general, there are always exceptions.  But this is what I see most of the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, you have hit on another area.  Those ME students probably don&#8217;t learn those skills at a University ME program.  I hear that from ME Lab Techs all the time that students don&#8217;t have those skills.  Why you ask?  Because they did not go through a secondary or post-secondary Technical Program.  They went straight from a regular high school to University.  High Schools don&#8217;t neccessarily teach those kind of things.  Industrial Arts programs have been systematically stripped out of middle &amp; high schools, due to funding and perception issues.  A major shame!  You need to let high school principals and superintendents this.  Universities usually don&#8217;t teach skills like that.  </p>
<p>I am being general, there are always exceptions.  But this is what I see most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kalis</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Kalis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, but I have had ME interns in my office with 4.0 grade point averages designing fixtures with CAD software that didn&#039;t know what a tap drill was. Technological education only gets you so far, they need input from the shop floor in order to be competent. Educators need to instill that in them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, but I have had ME interns in my office with 4.0 grade point averages designing fixtures with CAD software that didn&#8217;t know what a tap drill was. Technological education only gets you so far, they need input from the shop floor in order to be competent. Educators need to instill that in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Haskell</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is tough to be &quot;old school&quot; these days.  I have grown children in their 20&#039;s and I meet many HS/College students.  They don&#039;t always think the same way we do.  Technology is pushing them even faster than before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is tough to be &#8220;old school&#8221; these days.  I have grown children in their 20&#8242;s and I meet many HS/College students.  They don&#8217;t always think the same way we do.  Technology is pushing them even faster than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speakingofprecision</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[speakingofprecision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understood Glen. But to answer your question, perhaps  I would have wanted the  very talented guy or gal who thought that they wanted a career as a CNC precision machinist who have demonstrated skills on math and gaming and virtual reality who was totally turned off by the ancient manual equipment in the shop. Is that a sign of their lack of motivation that they would let that put them off? Perhaps. Perhaps too it is a sign that we are deliberately providing a barrier to getting our best and brightest into the trade by insisting they start out using what they think to be &quot;seriously old school&quot; or &quot;Fred Flintstone&quot; equipment. (They wouldn&#039;t even call it &quot;technology.&quot;)
Thanks for sharing your thoguhtful point of view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understood Glen. But to answer your question, perhaps  I would have wanted the  very talented guy or gal who thought that they wanted a career as a CNC precision machinist who have demonstrated skills on math and gaming and virtual reality who was totally turned off by the ancient manual equipment in the shop. Is that a sign of their lack of motivation that they would let that put them off? Perhaps. Perhaps too it is a sign that we are deliberately providing a barrier to getting our best and brightest into the trade by insisting they start out using what they think to be &#8220;seriously old school&#8221; or &#8220;Fred Flintstone&#8221; equipment. (They wouldn&#8217;t even call it &#8220;technology.&#8221;)<br />
Thanks for sharing your thoguhtful point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kalis</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Kalis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an old schooler graduate of Vincennes University / tool &amp; die, (mid 80&#039;s) the hands on training has been invaluable. It makes tou apply, and sometimes discover mechanical aptitude that many people may not know exists. Sure, technology in the metal cutting field has escalated exponentially since then, but the fact of the matter remains, operators still need to know the basics! You learn to crawl before you can walk. Who do you want responsible for your most advanced and expensive equipment???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an old schooler graduate of Vincennes University / tool &amp; die, (mid 80&#8242;s) the hands on training has been invaluable. It makes tou apply, and sometimes discover mechanical aptitude that many people may not know exists. Sure, technology in the metal cutting field has escalated exponentially since then, but the fact of the matter remains, operators still need to know the basics! You learn to crawl before you can walk. Who do you want responsible for your most advanced and expensive equipment???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Haskell</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard,

My company is a dealer for engineering equipment for schools; CAD/CAM/CNC and Festo Automation and Mechatronics products.  As well as other vendors of Robotics.  I worked in Job Placement for a Career &amp; Technical Education Center, 9 years as National Sales for Denford, who makes CAD/CAM/CNC equipment for education and now as President of my own educational reselling organization.  

In some ways you are correct, but there is much more to all of this.  All Career Tech programs have industry advisory committees whose duty is to provide industrial relevance to CT programs, whether secondary or post-secondary.  Some do well to the programs , some don&#039;t.  Often it comes down to dollars.  Haas has had a program where they bring in CNC equipment on loan to a school, but reserve the right to take it out if they have a customer who needs that piece of equipment.  I think they actually replace it too.  We used to sell larger CNC equipment,until Haas came out with a buy 1 get 1 free program for large CNC equipment at schools.  Hard to compete.  Denford refocused on selling CNC routers, which teaches the basic concepts.  Many machining teachers feel that students should know the feel of a manual machine before they move on to CNC.  Of course, there are older teachers who are tenured and have no interest in furthering their skills beyond what they know.

One big problem is that students aren&#039;t signing up for these classes.  The math &amp; science requirements (STEM) are scaring them off.  Mom&#039;s and Dad&#039;s are telling them that when the economy slows, they will be the first to be laid off and it&#039;s not prestigeous to be a CNC Operator, they should go on to be a lawyer or something else etc.  The dirty, dungy, grimy environment  still comes to peoples mind, even though we know that is not true.  I have been battling this issue for 25 years!  Also, on the high school level, counselors try to send their least able student to the Career Centers, because they want to dump them, get them out of the rgular high school.  Often, these students are ill prepared to handle students of this caliber.  Doing advanced work is tough to do.  Sometimes, it is 60-70% of the instructors student base.  As one of my old instructors used to say, &quot;It&#039;s hard to make a silk purse out of a sows ear, but we try&quot;.  He was a fine teacher too.

Regular high schools goals are to get every student into college, not a tech schools. Perception is we need more business majors, socialologists, lawyers, etc. 

And sometime industry sends mixed messages.  At a Philly area post-secondary school recently, the Job Placement coordinator complained to me (as I was instlaling some additional engineering equipment) that the local employers reviewed their program and said this is good, we need some of your students.  When they went to apply for the jobs, they said they didn&#039;t have the skills and preparation they needed.  They were not happy students.   Other students got turned away by other companies for similar reasons.  
I know this may be one situation, but there are many on both sides.  

I guess the best you can do, if looking for future employees, is to work with your local CT programs (HS &amp; Post-secondary) to insure they are able to get being taught the right skills with the right equipment for your area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>My company is a dealer for engineering equipment for schools; CAD/CAM/CNC and Festo Automation and Mechatronics products.  As well as other vendors of Robotics.  I worked in Job Placement for a Career &amp; Technical Education Center, 9 years as National Sales for Denford, who makes CAD/CAM/CNC equipment for education and now as President of my own educational reselling organization.  </p>
<p>In some ways you are correct, but there is much more to all of this.  All Career Tech programs have industry advisory committees whose duty is to provide industrial relevance to CT programs, whether secondary or post-secondary.  Some do well to the programs , some don&#8217;t.  Often it comes down to dollars.  Haas has had a program where they bring in CNC equipment on loan to a school, but reserve the right to take it out if they have a customer who needs that piece of equipment.  I think they actually replace it too.  We used to sell larger CNC equipment,until Haas came out with a buy 1 get 1 free program for large CNC equipment at schools.  Hard to compete.  Denford refocused on selling CNC routers, which teaches the basic concepts.  Many machining teachers feel that students should know the feel of a manual machine before they move on to CNC.  Of course, there are older teachers who are tenured and have no interest in furthering their skills beyond what they know.</p>
<p>One big problem is that students aren&#8217;t signing up for these classes.  The math &amp; science requirements (STEM) are scaring them off.  Mom&#8217;s and Dad&#8217;s are telling them that when the economy slows, they will be the first to be laid off and it&#8217;s not prestigeous to be a CNC Operator, they should go on to be a lawyer or something else etc.  The dirty, dungy, grimy environment  still comes to peoples mind, even though we know that is not true.  I have been battling this issue for 25 years!  Also, on the high school level, counselors try to send their least able student to the Career Centers, because they want to dump them, get them out of the rgular high school.  Often, these students are ill prepared to handle students of this caliber.  Doing advanced work is tough to do.  Sometimes, it is 60-70% of the instructors student base.  As one of my old instructors used to say, &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to make a silk purse out of a sows ear, but we try&#8221;.  He was a fine teacher too.</p>
<p>Regular high schools goals are to get every student into college, not a tech schools. Perception is we need more business majors, socialologists, lawyers, etc. </p>
<p>And sometime industry sends mixed messages.  At a Philly area post-secondary school recently, the Job Placement coordinator complained to me (as I was instlaling some additional engineering equipment) that the local employers reviewed their program and said this is good, we need some of your students.  When they went to apply for the jobs, they said they didn&#8217;t have the skills and preparation they needed.  They were not happy students.   Other students got turned away by other companies for similar reasons.<br />
I know this may be one situation, but there are many on both sides.  </p>
<p>I guess the best you can do, if looking for future employees, is to work with your local CT programs (HS &amp; Post-secondary) to insure they are able to get being taught the right skills with the right equipment for your area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Vickery</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Vickery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree in that whomever is providing the training should step back and ask themselves, What is needed? To insist on knowledge of manual equipment is not without value, although may not be essential, or even applicable in many situations today. I believe that the insistence on manual training is more a comfort that an individual has an understaning of basic machining. Is it necessary for beginners? I would have to say no. If an individual is trained to operate a CNC machine, they will ultimately gain an understanding and pursue the technology that they are exposed to contingent on their own personal desire. 
Great Point and definitely somthing to consider.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree in that whomever is providing the training should step back and ask themselves, What is needed? To insist on knowledge of manual equipment is not without value, although may not be essential, or even applicable in many situations today. I believe that the insistence on manual training is more a comfort that an individual has an understaning of basic machining. Is it necessary for beginners? I would have to say no. If an individual is trained to operate a CNC machine, they will ultimately gain an understanding and pursue the technology that they are exposed to contingent on their own personal desire.<br />
Great Point and definitely somthing to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speakingofprecision</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[speakingofprecision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Brian. You have the time in the trenches in this area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Brian. You have the time in the trenches in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Haskell</title>
		<link>http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/2012/08/14/training-what-we-want-vs-what-we-need/#comment-5740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmpaspeakingofprecision.com/?p=6107#comment-5740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well stated Miles!  I have always treaded lightly with teachers in extolling this concept in machining.  Also, your point on teachers teach the way they were taught is so true!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated Miles!  I have always treaded lightly with teachers in extolling this concept in machining.  Also, your point on teachers teach the way they were taught is so true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
